Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
October 10, 2025

Approach for Qualifying Laser Powder Bed Fusion 316H in Section III, Division 5

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

MMMichael D McMurtreyCMCaleb MasseyMMMark Messner

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Analysis demonstrates LPBF 316H's properties in nuclear reactors, highlighting qualification challenges.

Key Points

  • LPBF 316H exhibits higher yield strength than wrought 316H, even after 10,000 hours aging.
  • Heat treatments significantly influence material properties, altering ductility and strength.
  • Creep results show lower rupture strains in LPBF 316H compared to wrought materials under similar conditions.
  • Batch variations impact mechanical properties more than heat treatments, indicating further testing is required.

Cite This Study

McMurtrey et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e8619c7ef2f04ca37e4447https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2025-155517
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Microstructural characterization and mechanical behaviour of laser powder Bed Fusion stainless steel 316L2024 · 19 citations
  2. 2Microstructural Stability of 316 L Produced by Additive Manufacturing for Nuclear Applications2026
  3. 3A comprehensive investigation on microstructure and mechanical properties optimisation of 316L stainless steel produced by laser-based powder bed fusion2026
  4. 4Tensile Performance Sensitivity to Variations of Standard 17-4 PH Heat Treatments on LPBF-Produced Material2025 · 1 citations
  5. 5Determining the Necessity of Post‐Processing Heat Treatment for the 316L Stainless Steel Manufactured by Laser Powder Bed Fusion through Evaluation of Mechanical and Corrosion Properties2024 · 11 citations