This article advocates for tooth retention in restorative dentistry, suggesting ethical implications for treatment planning in endodontics.
The increasing popularity of dental implants has significantly transformed modern restorative dentistry, often positioning implants as a first-line treatment even when natural teeth could be salvaged. This shift, while supported by technological advancements and high success rates, raises ethical and clinical concerns regarding the premature extraction of teeth that are amenable to preservation. This article advocates for a biologically conservative approach, emphasizing the unique functional and psychological value of natural dentition. By promoting interdisciplinary collaboration and critical decision-making, it encourages clinicians to prioritize tooth retention when feasible, reinforcing the principle that preservation should precede replacement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abhishek Kumar (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: