Retrospective analysis compares the 3 × 3 mm and 6 × 6 mm SS-OCTA patterns for macular neovascularization detection, suggesting that 3 × 3 mm scans are superior.
Purpose To compare the effectiveness of 3 × 3 mm versus 6 × 6 mm swept source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA) scan patterns in detecting and characterizing pachychoroid-associated macular neovascularization (MNV). Methods We retrospectively analyzed 79 eyes from 79 treatment-naïve patients with pachychoroid-associated MNV using SS-OCTA. Both 3 × 3 mm and 6 × 6 mm scans were obtained on the same day. Two masked graders independently evaluated neovascular network area and presence of anastomoses. Results Mean lesion areas were significantly larger in 6 × 6 mm scans compared to 3 × 3 mm scans (0.869 ± 0.868 mm² vs 0.699 ± 0.697 mm²; p = 0.005). However, analysis of anastomoses revealed superior detection with 3 × 3 mm scans, with 12 eyes (15.2%) showing anastomoses only in 3 × 3 mm scans compared to 4 eyes (5.1%) visible only in 6 × 6 mm scans ( p = 0.021). Interobserver agreement was excellent for area measurements (ICC = 0.92). Conclusions While 6 × 6 mm SS-OCTA scans demonstrate larger overall neovascular area measurements, the 3 × 3 mm scan pattern provides superior visualization of anastomoses and fine vascular details in pachychoroid-associated MNV. These findings suggest that 3 × 3 mm scans should be considered the preferred protocol for detailed evaluation of these lesions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pignataro et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: