Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis reveals that regional policies on digital transformation improve governance and competitiveness, highlighting action areas.
The article analyzes the foundations of Ukraine's state regional policy for digital transformation, including the regulatory framework, strategic documents, and regional informatization programs. It is determined that implementing digital technologies is a key direction of state policy aimed at creating conditions for the development of an information society, integrating modern technologies into public administration, and ensuring the competitiveness of regions. Considering the decentralization of power, conditions are being created to align regional development policies with key areas of digital transformation, including the digitalization of regional governance, the development of the digital economy, the implementation of innovative technologies, process automation, the expansion of e-government, and the formation of e-democracy tools, among others. The study found that the primary tool for ensuring digital transformation at the regional level is regional informatization programs developed by the standard project for such programs approved by the Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine. As of January 1, 2025, 16 regions of Ukraine have adopted these programs, which cover the implementation of e-government, digital infrastructure, cybersecurity, digital literacy, and more. Disparities in financing and levels of digital maturity among regions have been identified, requiring improved coordination mechanisms and ensuring the balanced development of digital infrastructure at the regional level. The study's results emphasize the need to synchronize regional programs with national priorities, integrate European digitalization standards, and implement a monitoring system to assess program effectiveness. These aspects are crucial for the harmonious development of a digital state, ensuring equal access to modern technologies and improving the efficiency of public administration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Horbliuk et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: