Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Theoretical analysis highlights implementation of PIC/S standards in public governance, suggesting strategies for effective regulation.
This article provides a theoretical and methodological substantiation of contemporary approaches to public governance in the pharmaceutical sector through an analysis of the implementation processes of PIC/S international standards into national regulatory practice. The conceptual evolution of approaches to PIC/S standards implementation is analyzed in the context of regulatory paradigm transformation from a command-and-control model to smart regulation. Key principles of international standards implementation are identified, including systemic approach, adaptability, proportionality, inclusiveness, transparency, evidence-based decision-making, innovation, and sustainability. The paper proposes a conceptual model for PIC/S standards implementation that integrates five interconnected components: strategic planning, institutional capacity building, legal-regulatory harmonization, procedural standardization, and information-technological integration. Factors influencing the effectiveness of implementation processes are identified and systematized, and a complex of practical recommendations for their optimization is developed. Based on the analysis of international experience, the research substantiates that the effectiveness of PIC/S standards implementation is determined by a complex of interrelated factors, with key elements being: political will and strategic vision, institutional capacity of regulatory authorities, quality of the legal-regulatory framework, change management system, technological capability, personnel competence, and international cooperation. The importance of a systems approach to developing these factors is demonstrated, emphasizing not their isolated improvement but the construction of an integrated regulatory ecosystem. The research establishes that optimizing PIC/S standards implementation processes requires developing a comprehensive strategy with priority directions: institutional capacity building, legal-regulatory framework harmonization, human capital development, digital transformation, and enhancement of international cooperation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Degtyar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: