October 10, 2025JIHKOpen Access

Can Electronic Evidence Constitute Sufficient Grounds for Criminal Liability?

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

The study finds that electronic evidence has gained legitimacy under Indonesian law, but challenges remain in its use and acceptance.
Based on the Constitutional Court Decision No. 20/PUU-XIV/2016, electronic evidence is formally acknowledged but faces significant legal hurdles.
A normative juridical approach to assess electronic evidence highlights the essential role of digital forensics in ensuring its integrity.
Developing standardized protocols for digital evidence is vital for reforming the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code to enhance justice.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

Analysis reveals challenges in admissibility and implementation of electronic evidence in Indonesian criminal law, highlighting the need for legal reforms.

Cite This Study

Suryana et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e865117ef2f04ca37e4c9a https://doi.org/10.46924/jihk.v7i1.323

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Analysis reveals challenges in admissibility and implementation of electronic evidence in Indonesian criminal law, highlighting the need for legal reforms.

Can Electronic Evidence Constitute Sufficient Grounds for Criminal Liability?

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Can Electronic Evidence Constitute Sufficient Grounds for Criminal Liability?

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study