Legal judgment document summarization, as a task specific to the legal domain, involves automatically generating a fluent, informative, and well-organized summary from the original legal judgment document. Unlike traditional text summarization tasks, this domain-specific task places higher demands on content accuracy and completeness in the summary, while also requiring the preservation of the professional expression found in the original text. Consequently, conventional summarization methods often struggle to perform effectively in the legal domain. In response to this challenge, this paper introduces a hybrid summarization model tailored for legal judgment documents. Our model harnesses the strengths of both extractive and abstractive summarization methods, incorporating domain knowledge to enhance the summary generation process. We conduct extensive experiments to verify the effectiveness of our proposed method and compare the results with a baseline using ROUGE evaluation metrics. The experimental findings highlight that our model excels in providing more accurate and readable summarizations compared to traditional methods.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Song Yu-mei
Guizhou University
Ruizhang Huang
Guizhou University
Yanping Chen
China State Construction Engineering (China)
Information Technology And Control
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yu-mei et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e865117ef2f04ca37e4f17 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.itc.53.3.36602
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: