The framework uncovers distinct phenomena in perception, suggesting improved insights into ecological affordances.
Ko and Neuberg introduce a framework for understanding how ecological affordances are perceived. I suggest that a broad conception of “perception” conflates distinct phenomena in a way that can limit our understanding of ecological affordances. Distinguishing between these phenomena can prevent a conceptual jingle fallacy and facilitate our understanding of how the mind evolved to represent and manage ecological challenges.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joshua M. Tybur (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: