This Mendelian randomization investigation links plasma proteins to postherpetic neuralgia, suggesting biomarkers. Significant associations were found using GWAS data and sensitivity analysis.
Background The proteome represents a valuable resource for identifying therapeutic targets and clarifying disease mechanisms in neurological disorders. This study investigated potential causal relationships between plasma proteins and postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). Methods We conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis using genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics from the Decode Genetics dataset (4,907 plasma proteins) and the FinnGen database (490 PHN cases and 435,371 controls). Instrumental variables (IVs) were selected based on relevance, independence, and exclusivity. Causal associations were assessed using inverse-variance weighted (IVW), MR-Egger regression, simple mode, weighted mode, and weighted median methods. Sensitivity analyses, including leave-one-out tests, evaluated result robustness, while colocalization analysis examined shared causal variants between traits. Results Eight plasma proteins showed significant associations with PHN (PFDR < 0.05). Higher levels of ATRN, PIANP, and CD48 correlated with increased PHN risk, whereas elevated KIR2DL5A, GPI, SEMG2, EIF4B, and HFE2 levels were associated with reduced risk. Sensitivity analyses supported these findings and excluded genetic pleiotropy as a major confounding factor. Colocalization analysis did not detect shared causal variants (PPH4 < 0.8). Conclusion These results suggest a potential causal role for eight plasma proteins in PHN pathogenesis. While these proteins may serve as biomarkers or therapeutic candidates, further validation is required. This study advances understanding of PHN pathophysiology and supports future investigations into diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wei et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: