Study finds impaired self-other voice discrimination in schizophrenia patients with auditory-verbal hallucinations, indicating potential biomarker for diagnosis.
Background and Hypothesis Auditory-verbal hallucinations (AVH), hearing voices without external speakers, are a core symptom of schizophrenia. A prominent account proposes that AVH reflect failures to recognize self-generated speech. Similar effects in hallucination-prone individuals suggest that these mechanisms span a continuum from subclinical to clinical manifestations. We used a self-other voice discrimination (SOVD) task, previously identified as a potential biomarker of self-disturbance, to assess self-recognition deficits in patients with (AVH+) and without (AVH−) a history of AVH, as well as in healthy individuals. Study Design 41 schizophrenia patients (23 AVH+, 18 AVH−) and 40 healthy controls completed the SOVD task. In a follow-up experiment, 26 additional healthy participants performed a familiar-other voice discrimination task identical to SOVD, but without the self-voice. In patients, performance was tested in relation to symptom severity (PANSS), and in controls to hallucination proneness scores. Study Results SOVD performance was selectively impaired in AVH+ patients, while AVH− patients did not substantially differ from controls. Across groups, higher PANSS and hallucination proneness scores were specifically related to reduced self-voice recognition, with no impact on other-voice recognition. This effect did not extend to familiar-other voice discrimination. Conclusions Impaired self-voice recognition is a promising selective marker of AVH occurrence in the acute phase of schizophrenia and extends to hallucination proneness in the general population. These findings support a dimensional view of hallucinations and point to deficits specific to self-voice processing rather than general voice perception. They also highlight SOVD as a promising cognitive biomarker of AVH, with direct implications for early identification and targeted interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vukojević et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: