Analysis reveals Americans realistically estimate climate beliefs, with varying views between Democrats and Republicans.
Abstract The public’s underestimation of other people’s climate beliefs, worry, and support for action has been described as a false sense of reality. The finding has led to correcting these second-order beliefs (beliefs about other people’s beliefs) to promote climate engagement and actions. In contrast, we demonstrate that Americans (N = 1980) realistically assesses other Americans opinions about climate change as national problem: They fairly accurately estimate the percentage of Americans (46% vs 41%, estimate vs. actual, respectively) who believe climate change is a “very big” problem; overestimate Republican’s opinions (29% vs. 13%) and accurately estimate Democrat’s views (66% vs. 67%). Following these estimates for Republicans and Democrats, their direct estimates of the size of the political divide on this topic are reasonably accurate (50% vs. 54%). Moreover, they are sensitive to the extent to which Americans, Democrats, and Republicans endorse this opinion relative to 19 other potential national top problems. Our research challenges the characterization of climate-related second-order beliefs, calls for attention to the topics that Americans think are most and least important, and has potential implications for communication about second-order beliefs as a means of motivating support for actions to address climate change.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Swim et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: