Head-to-head comparison reveals strong performance of plasma p-tau217 assays for detecting amyloid positivity in diverse cohorts, indicating reliability across methods.
Background: Plasma ptau217 is a promising biomarker for detecting incipient AD pathology, but direct comparison of different ptau217 assays in community-based cohorts are limited. Methods: We evaluated two cohorts from southwestern Pennsylvania, USA; the MYHATNI substudy, which included two-year longitudinal follow-up neuroimaging assessments of Aβ, tau, and cortical thickness; and the Human Connectome Project/CoBRA, targeting a 50:50 split of self-identified Black and non-Hispanic White individuals. Plasma p-tau217 was measured using four different assays: Lumipulse, Johnson&Johnson, ALZpath, and NULISA. Aβ and tau pathologies were assessed with [11C]PiB PET and [18F]Flortaucipir PET, respectively. Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment were used to assess cognitive performance. Results: We included 344 participants (MYHAT-NI: n=111, median age 76 [IQR: 72;80], 54% female; HCP/CoBRA: n=234, median age 62 [IQR: 52;70], 65% female). All four ptau217 assays exhibited moderate to strong cross-platform correlations (Spearman correlations of 0.40; 0.86), and statistically equivalent AUCs (of 0.84; 0.90) for determining Aβ positivity. Conclusions: Our findings showed strong equivalent performances of plasma ptau217 assays to identify amyloid positivity across two highly diverse cohorts of community dwelling older adults.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deek et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: