Simulation study reveals optimal seatback angles and stiffness for minimizing occupant injury risk, suggesting key design improvements for safety.
This study investigates occupant–seat interaction dynamics in high-speed train frontal collisions. A finite element model of a second-class double seat was developed and simulated using LS-DYNA R12.1 software with a Hybrid III dummy, applying trapezoidal and triangular acceleration pulses per European and American standards. The research analyzes the impact of front-row seatback recline angles (0°, 10°, 20°) and seatback-to-base connection stiffness (1000 N/mm to 0 N/mm) on head, neck, chest, and leg injury severity. Results show that a 10° recline provides optimal protection under fixed stiffness. When optimizing both parameters, a 0° recline with approximately 300 N/mm stiffness minimizes composite injury metrics (HIC15, Nij, CTI). However, reducing stiffness at non-zero recline angles increases neck injury risk due to tray table displacement toward the cervical region. These findings emphasize the critical importance of integrated seat design optimization for rail passenger passive safety and highlight the need to mitigate tray table hazards.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: