Observational analysis shows significant carbon emissions linked to land use types in the Yangtze River Basin, highlighting the effectiveness of ensemble models in predicting these interactions.
Land use patterns are a critical driver of changes in carbon emissions, making it essential to elucidate the relationship between regional carbon emissions and land use types. As a nationally designated economic strategic zone, the Yangtze River Basin encompasses megacities, rapidly developing medium-sized cities, and relatively underdeveloped regions. However, the mechanism underlying the interaction between landscape patterns and carbon emissions across such gradients remains inadequately understood. This study utilizes nighttime light, land use and carbon emissions datasets, employing XGBoost, CatBoost, LightGBM and a stacking ensemble model to analyze the impacts and driving factors of land use changes on carbon emissions in the Yangtze River Basin from 2002 to 2022. The results showed: (1) The stacking ensemble learning model demonstrated the best predictive performance, with a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.80, a residual prediction deviation (RPD) of 2.22, and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 4.46. Compared with the next-best models, these performance metrics represent improvements of 19.40% in R2 and 28.32% in RPD, and a 22.16% reduction in RMSE. (2) Based on SHAP feature importance and Pearson correlation analysis, the primary drivers influencing CO2 net emissions in the Yangtze River Basin are GDP per capita (GDPpc), population density (POD), Tertiary industry share (TI), land use degree comprehensive index (LUI), dynamic degree of water-body land use (Kwater), Largest patch index (LPI), and number of patches (NP). These findings indicate that changes in regional landscape patterns exert a significant effect on carbon emissions in strategic economic regions, and that stacked ensemble models can effectively simulate and interpret this relationship with high predictive accuracy, thereby providing decision support for regional low-carbon development planning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: