Automated extraction with benzyl alcohol enhances read accuracy in blood cultures, suggesting better sepsis outcomes.
Background/Objective: Timely identification of bloodstream pathogens is critical for sepsis management; however, PCR inhibitors such as sodium polyanetholesulfonate (SPS) in blood culture broth compromise nucleic acid recovery and long read sequencing. We assessed whether coupling a benzyl alcohol SPS-removal step to the fully automated LabTurbo AIO extractor improves Oxford Nanopore-based pathogen detection. Methods: Thirteen positive blood culture broths were pre-treated with benzyl alcohol and divided: half volumes were purified on the LabTurbo AIO; paired aliquots underwent manual QIAamp extraction. DNA purity was evaluated by NanoDrop and Qubit. Barcoded libraries were sequenced on MinION R9.4.1 flow cells for 6 h. Results: Automated eluates showed a median A260/A280 of 1.92 and A260/A230 of 1.96, versus 1.80 and 1.48 for manual extracts. The automated workflow generated 1.69 × 106 total reads compared with 3.9 × 105 reads for manual extraction. The median N50 read length increased from 5.9 kb to 8.7 kb, and the median proportion of reads classified to species increased from 62% to 84%. The hands-on time was <5 min and the sample-to-answer turnaround was <8 h, compared with >9 h and 90 min for the manual protocol, respectively. Conclusions: Benzyl alcohol SPS removal integrated into the LabTurbo AIO extractor yielded purer, longer, and higher read counts, enhancing nanopore sequencing depth and accuracy while compressing diagnostic turnaround to a single working day. This represents a practical advance for rapid blood culture pathogen identification in critical care settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tai et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: