This analysis presents an intelligent multi-criteria decision-making framework for risk assessment and control strategies, emphasizing safety and adaptability.
The emergence of Industry 5.0 brings a paradigm shift towards collaborative environments where humans and intelligent robots work side-by-side, enabling personalized, flexible, and resilient manufacturing. However, integrating humans and robots introduces new operational and safety risks that require proactive and adaptive control strategies. This study proposes an intelligent multi-criteria decision-making framework for smart risk assessment and the selection of optimal adaptive control strategies in human–robot collaborative manufacturing settings. The proposed framework integrates advanced risk analytics, real-time data processing, and expert knowledge to evaluate alternative control strategies, such as real-time wearable sensor integration, vision-based dynamic safety zones, AI-driven behavior prediction models, haptic feedback, and self-learning adaptive robot algorithms. A cross-disciplinary panel of ten experts structures six main and eighteen sub-criteria spanning safety, adaptability, ergonomics, reliability, performance, and cost, with response time and implementation/maintenance costs modeled as cost types. Safety receives the most significant weight; the most influential sub-criteria are collision avoidance efficiency, return on investment (ROI), and emergency response capability. The framework preserves linguistic semantics from elicitation to aggregation and provides a transparent, uncertainty-aware tool for selecting and phasing adaptive control strategies in Industry 5.0 collaborative cells.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ayyıldız et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: