This synthesis reveals guilt's dualistic role in psychological processes, suggesting culturally sensitive insights for therapy.
Guilt, a multifaceted and self-conscious emotion, has been relatively underexplored in psychiatric and psychological research, often overshadowed by the extensive focus on shame. This article synthesizes three key research traditions: intrapsychic, interpersonal, and integrative. Intrapsychic guilt, rooted in psychoanalytic theory, is associated with maladaptive outcomes, including neuroticism and self-critical tendencies. Conversely, interpersonal guilt, emphasized in social psychology, promotes empathy, prosocial behavior, and ethical decision-making, highlighting its adaptive functions. The emerging integrative approach bridges these perspectives, revealing guilt’s dualistic role in psychological processes. In addition, the Indian literature, although limited, offers valuable cultural insights, emphasizing the need for culturally sensitive research to address guilt’s implications in psychopathology, counseling, and therapy. This synthesis underscores the importance of a comprehensive understanding of guilt and advocates for further research, particularly in the Indian context, to enhance clinical practices and therapeutic interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abraham et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: