This analysis reveals how a contact tracing app shaped public health norms in citizens, highlighting implications for digital citizenship.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, states around the world used smartphone apps to break chains of infection. Some functioned as a passport or enabled states to enforce certain rules on their citizens. Others, such as the German contact tracing app, were less intrusive, anonymously informing users about their high-risk encounters with an infected person. This article analyses how the German app configured state-citizen relations using infrastructure-building as a conceptual lens. Drawing on interviews with app developers, public health offices, and users, we show how the app’s technological setup instantiated norms and expectations about what it meant to be a good citizen during the pandemic. These instantiations of citizenship evolved as the app and its infrastructure became a constant source of friction. The public controversy around its digital architecture led to a fundamental modification of its design principles, which imbued them with a liberal conception of citizenship. This shift, however, caused a disconnect from manual contact tracing procedures by public health authorities and turned pandemic conduct into a mostly private affair. Because the app precluded sovereign governmental action against citizens, it made users responsible for prudent self-governance within an imagined community of vulnerable others without providing sufficient political, social, and technological support.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hall et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: