October 12, 2025Open Access

The SSP debate on "the open access movement has failed" — part 1: speech for the motion

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

The debate presents arguments asserting the open access movement's failure to achieve its goals, impacting scholarly communication.
Key evidence includes a historical overview of the movement's intentions versus current outcomes in publishing practices.
The discussion unfolds in a plenary debate format, emphasizing contrasting views on the movement's effectiveness and future.
Implications of the debate may affect policy decisions related to scholarly publishing and access to research.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Plenary debate argues the stance that the open access movement has failed, highlighting repercussions in scholarly communication.

Mike Taylor (2024) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark