This analysis demonstrates that differing binding modes dictate nitrite reduction pathways in Iron(III) complexes, highlighting contributions from protonation and hydrogen transfers.
To elucidate the mechanisms of iron‐mediated nitrite reduction, we synthesized and fully characterized Fe(III)‐NO 2 − complexes featuring distinct κ 1 –O (nitrito) and κ 1 –N (nitro) binding modes, supported by a tris (benzenethiolato)phosphine ligand derivative. Interconversion between these two linkage isomers is modulated by a Na + cation in the secondary coordination sphere. These binding motifs direct divergent nitrite reduction pathways. For the κ 1 –O isomer, reduction is initiated by hydrogen atom or hydride transfer to yield an {FeNO} 7 species, whereas protonation results in formation of an {FeNO} 6 complex. Hydrogen atom transfer and protonation are accompanied by hydroxyl radical generation, while hydride transfer produces hydroxide. In contrast, the κ 1 –N isomer undergoes nitrite reduction exclusively via protonation. Detailed computational studies afford a mechanistic rationale for how nitrite binding modes govern distinct nitrite reduction trajectories.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: