Simulation-based study evaluates strategies for automated and driver-operated vehicle interactions, indicating effects on traffic performance.
As automated vehicles (AVs) are introduced into the traffic fleet, their operational differences from driver-operated vehicles (DVs) may impact traffic performance and safety. Researchers suggest that dedicated lanes could reduce AV-DV interactions. This paper presents a simulation-based study evaluating the performance of four ML strategies in mixed AV-DV traffic, considering lane position, and access control, AV market adoption rate, and ML eligibility. Sixteen ML cases were optimized and compared to a heterogeneous traffic environment based on capacity and efficiency. The results indicated that traffic demand level, MAR, and ML strategy can impact freeway performance. A heterogeneous traffic environment was favoured in most MARs and traffic demand levels. However, one AV left-side ML can be deployed at MARs of 25% regardless of access control, or one AV left-side ML with continuous access at 50% MAR. Implementation of these strategies would involve updating roadway signage to ensure correct usage of the freeway.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sarran et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: