Analysis shows forward GVC participation boosts female employment while backward participation reduces it.
Purpose This paper examines the impact of GVC participation on the female employment share and its mechanisms from the perspective of forward and backward participation. Design/methodology/approach The core dataset is drawn from the China Labour Statistics Yearbook and the OECD's World Input-Output Tables (2021 edition). Based on these data, the paper employs fixed-effects models and an instrumental-variables approach. Findings The results reveal a clear distinction: forward GVC participation significantly increases female employment share, whereas backward GVC participation tends to reduce it. The impact operates through two key mechanisms: endogenous service input and total factor productivity. The effects are stronger in the tertiary sector than in the secondary and among women with medium- or high-skill levels than among those with low skills. Originality/value By distinguishing forward from backward GVC participation, this paper provides industry-level evidence on their differential associations with the female employment share and offers directional insights on engaging GVCs in ways more supportive of women's employment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: