A new method enhances CEST imaging accuracy and reproducibility in healthy individuals, indicating potential for clinical use.
Purpose: To develop and validate a framework for rapid, accurate, and reproducible whole-brain, multi-pool chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging at 3T, addressing challenges of long acquisition times and confounding factors. Methods: A single-shot 3D true fast imaging with steady-state precession (True FISP) sequence was optimized for whole-brain multi-pool CEST. Rapid B0, B1, and T1 mapping was performed using a dual-echo modified four-angle method. A feed-forward neural network was developed for rapid B1 correction, trained against the conventional multi-power method. The apparent exchange-dependent relaxation (AREX) metric was used to correct for T1 and magnetization transfer (MT) effects. The framework was validated in phantoms and healthy human subjects (N=8), including a test-retest reproducibility assessment. Results: The True FISP sequence yielded high-quality, whole-brain images with minimal artifacts and distortion in a clinically feasible scan time (~9 minutes). Phantom studies confirmed the effectiveness of B1 correction (coefficient of variation [CV] for MT_MTRLD decreased from 22.49% to 4.61%) and AREX-based confounder correction (CV for APT_AREX reduced from 33.6% to 6.9%). The neural network B1 correction showed excellent agreement with the conventional multi-power method in vivo (ICC > 0.97). High test-retest reproducibility was demonstrated across 96 brain regions, with the average CV for APT_AREX under 10% for over 95% of regions. Conclusion: A rapid and robust framework for whole-brain quantitative multi-pool CEST imaging was successfully developed and validated. By integrating an efficient acquisition sequence with a streamlined correction pipeline, this approach overcomes key barriers to clinical translation, enabling reliable metabolic imaging for widespread brain pathologies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: