Analysis of forest management improves species composition and productivity in forest areas, suggesting effective protection measures.
The results of the forest management study in accordance with the forest management instruction approved by the Order of the Ministry of Natural Resources of the Russian Federation «On approval of forest management Instruction» dated 29.03.2018 № 122 (registration with the Ministry of Justice dated 20.04.2018 No. 50859) are considered. Based on the results of the study of the taxation characteristics of the design object, an analysis of reproduction, improvement of the species composition and quality of forests, increase in their productivity, and design of measures for the protection, protection, and reproduction of forests are provided. A forest, as a collection of forest vegetation, land, wildlife, and other environmental components, has important ecological, economic, and social significance. In order to use forests in the interests of humans without harming the environment, it is necessary to make an inventory of them and organize forestry in them. Forest management is a system of measures to ensure the rational use of the forest fund and improve the efficiency of forest management. Purposes. The design of operational forests, protective forests, reserve forests, as well as specially protected forest areas is carried out in order to subdivide forests into types for their intended purpose and allocate specially protected forest areas in these forests. Methodologies. In the process of researching the design problem, the method of age classes, the method based on the formation of economic sections, and the precinct method were used. Results. The block of these quarters is characterized by an uneven distribution of plant areas by age classes, overgrown plantings predominate. In the block of quarters being developed, the main use is carried out in the form of continuous cutting of operational forests. The forest area is characterized by a predominance of coniferous species, mainly Korean cedar.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agashirinova et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: