Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis compares nanofiber sensors with commercial PZT sensors for impact detection, suggesting improved damage control.
This work presents the development of a self-sensing Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polimer (CFRP) laminate embedding P(VDF-TrFE) nanofibers for real-time impact detection and localization. Four nanostructured sensors were embedded within the midplane of cross-ply laminates and compared against laminates incorporating commercial PZT sensors. A probabilistic impact localization algorithm based on Gaussian Process Regression and differential Time of Arrival (dToA) measurements were implemented. While PZT sensors exhibited higher localization accuracy (RMSE=2.32 cm) compared to nanofiber-based sensors (RMSE=3.37 cm), they caused more severe interfacial damage under low-velocity impacts. In contrast, the nanostructured sensors confined damage to the polymeric interlayer, preserving the CFRP integrity. The results highlight the potential of nanofiber-based sensing layers as a scalable, minimally invasive solution for Structural Health Monitoring in aerospace composites.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mongioì et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: