Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
October 15, 2025Istoriya

Social and Legal Status of the Feudal Estate Meliks of the Eastern Region of Armenia in the 17th — 19th Centures

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

GMGohar Mkhitaryan

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Comparative historical analysis reveals how meliks' rights differed under Persian and local khan rule.

Key Points

  • The study highlights that the hereditary dignity of meliks was confirmed by the Persian shahs' firman.
  • During autocratic khan rule, meliks' rights became subject to the local khan's will, limiting their power.
  • The shah's firman didn't confer full ownership of the mahal, instead allowing for district administration.
  • The right to manage transformed into a form of property during the khan's rule, affecting meliks' asset control.

Cite This Study

Gohar Mkhitaryan (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68efa18f9d05deea71d13d63https://doi.org/10.18254/s207987840036013-3
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Studying the Concept of Titles in the Relationship between Armenians and the Qajar Government in Documents (Case Study of 96 Documents of the Persian Decrees of the Matenadaran of the Qajar Period)2025
  2. 2Merv khans (using the materials of the 19th c.)2024
  3. 3The Origin of the Khanate of Karabakh2024
  4. 4Migrations and Resettlements in the Territory of Medieval Shirvan2025
  5. 5ԱՂՎԵՆԻ ՍԱՀՄԱՆԱԴԻՐ ԺՈՂՈՎԻ ԿԱՆՈՆՆԵՐԸ ԵՎ ՆՐԱՆՑ ԱՂԵՐՍԸՆԱԽՈՐԴ ԵԿԵՂԵՑԱԿԱՆ ԺՈՂՈՎՆԵՐԻ ԿԱՆՈՆՆԵՐԻ ՀԵՏ/THE CANONS OF THE AGHVEN CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY AND THEIR INTERRELATION WITH WITH THE CANONS OF PREVIOUS CHURCH ASSEMBLIES2025