Bibliographical research examines meaning production via pronouns and pronominal absence in discourse, highlighting implications for communication.
The work in question, consists of a bibliographical research, aiming to analyze the relationbetween: production of meaning and discourse, being this discourse more specifically thelinguistic variation of the pronouns EU(I), MIM (ME) and PRONOMINAL ABSENCE in infinitivesentences initiated by the preposition PARA, under the aegis of authors such as: Herzfeld(2014); Rüdiger (2004), Calvet (2002); Silva (2019) and Silva e Koch (1998). Having as aguiding question: how is the production of meaning made through discourse in thecommunication process? In conclusion, regardless of pronominal use or pronominal absence,in both cases, the receiver only understands what was transmitted by the sender because thepronoun used is in the first-person singular, independent of whether it is straight or oblique.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guilherme Pastana Fonseca de Oliveira (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: