Abstract Understanding the physiological condition of the vascular system is critical to explain, treat, and manage vascular disease. Numerous experimental and computational studies characterize the mechanical behavior of arterial tissue under controlled laboratory conditions. However, translating this knowledge into physiologically realistic conditions remains challenging. Key difficulties include selecting suitable and relevant test methods, minimizing uncertainty, and ensuring robust model validation. We present a novel integrative approach to translate laboratory experiments on arterial samples into clinically relevant pressure—diameter behavior. We perform controlled planar-biaxial tests on carotid arteries under three stretch ratios and generate axial and circumferential stress?stretch data to calibrate a fiber-reinforced soft tissue model. Using an analytical thick-walled cylindrical model, we predict subject-specific pressure—diameter behavior, informed by arterial prestretches from ring opening experiments. We systematically compare predictions against extension-inflation experiments on tubes from the same artery by applying controlled pairs of axial stretch and inner pressure, while recording outer diameter. We quantify prediction error in absolute and relative stretch regimes and evaluate the importance of the load-free reference dimensions. Results show how planar-biaxial tests probe different stretch regimes compared to extension-inflation deformations, leading to extrapolation of model predictions. We demonstrate how the constitutive material parameters can be fitted to different biomechanical loading conditions and assess the sensitivity of the simulations to axial stretch and circumferential prestretch. Only when key model parameters are accurately captured and their uncertainty propagated, planar-biaxial stress—stretch data can reliably predict arterial pressure?diameter behavior.
Vervenne et al. (2025) studied this question.