PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 15, 2025Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery3 citationsOpen Access

Bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: a retrospective study of 1001 patients

View Full Paper
FGFilippo GerberDWDaniel WagnerGPGeneviève Perrenoud

Key Points

  • Cemented hip hemiarthroplasty is a safe method for treating femoral neck fractures in elderly patients.
  • Out of 1001 patients, only 3.9% required revision surgery within four years post-operation.
  • Age over 80 and ASA score III or IV were strong predictors of higher mortality within four years.
  • Timing and surgical approach did not significantly influence revision rates or outcomes.

Abstract

Displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures (FNF) are the most frequent surgical pathology in orthopedics. Controversy surrounds optimal treatment, with little consensus, particularly in the elderly multimorbid at risk population. For over a decade, our institution adopts a standardized protocol for FNF, utilizing cemented hip hemiarthroplasty (HA) via the posterior approach. This study evaluates the outcomes of this approach, contributing to the ongoing debate and potentially guiding future treatment strategies. This retrospective study included patients (≥ 60 years) who underwent HA for FNF from January 1, 2008, to June 30, 2019, at a University Hospital. Our primary endpoint was revision surgery for HA (rHA) within four years after HA. Secondary endpoints included hip-related and unrelated complications. Of 1001 patients, 40 (3.9%) underwent rHA. Indications were periprosthetic fractures (5; 0.5%), dislocation (15; 1.5%), suspected prosthetic joint infection (17; 1.7%), and acetabular erosion (3; 0.3%). Four-year mortality was 51%. Cox regression revealed age > 80 years (aHR 1.86, p < 0.001), ASA score III or IV (aHR 2.11, p < 0.001), and postoperative delirium (aHR 1.29, p < 0.05), as independent predictors of higher 4-year mortality. No difference was observed among patients with and without revision indication for ASA scores III or IV (64% vs. 64%; p = 0.912), surgery within 24 h (52% vs. 57%; p = 0.334), duration over 90 min (46% vs. 53%; p = 0.201), and surgery during the night shift (24% vs. 19%; p = 0.285). Board certification did not impact revision rates (39% vs. 39%; p = 1.000). Cemented HA is a safe and reliable treatment option for FNF, delivering consistent outcomes in the elderly multimorbid population, with low rates of rHA (3.9%). The posterior surgical approach, even in patients with heightened dislocation risk, remains a viable option. Timing of surgery (night/day) does not significantly affect revision rates, which could have substantial implications for surgical planning and healthcare resource allocation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gerber et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68efa18f9d05deea71d13fcehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-025-06073-7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper