Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This argument from nonbruteness suggests an ultimate explanation for reality, implying God's role as the absolute subject.
In this article, I present a new argument for God’s existence, which I term the argument from nonbruteness . The argument rests on the core premise that the fundamental structure of reality cannot be a brute fact and must have an ultimate reason. By focusing on the concept of self-evidence, I first examine the relationship between possible worlds and what I refer to as cognitive perspectives. I then argue that an ultimate explanation for reality’s fundamental structure necessitates an absolute perspective—one that fully grasps this explanation—thereby affirming the existence of God as the absolute subject who possesses it. I summarize the argument’s core ideas, provide a detailed exposition, and address potential objections.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Emanuel Rutten (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: