This analysis demonstrates a new integrated AHP tool for evaluating researchers' abilities, highlighting a hierarchical structure for better decision making.
Talent is the main factor of progress and prosperity in the world, and all the developments in the present era are related to the efforts of talent. Identifying talent, assessing their ability, and promoting talent is an important requirement for the sustainable development and competitiveness of enterprise. If talent assessment and management are not properly conducted, the enterprise will not meet the requirements of the developing reality and will not be able to achieve the future development. AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) is a comparative assessment method using human sense, which models the influence of the criteria associated with decision making into a hierarchical structure and allow to choose the best among alternatives to be selected. AHP is widely used in various fields of economy, military, society, management, education, medicine, etc. In this paper, we have considered the problem of determining of the researchers’ abilities objectively, intuitively and conveniently using the Integrated Analytical Hierarchy Process (IAHP). First, we have considered the development of IAHP tool in the Net-oriented System Description Language (NSDL) environment, developed by combining the advantages of Petri nets and object-oriented programming language VB. Compared with the previous AHP tools, the hierarchical structure model for the selection of the optimum alternative is built with Petri net diagrams to improve the intuition and convenience of tool. Also, the introduction of the File Alternative Element (SFile) allows us to build a hierarchical structure model more conveniently and simply in the case of a large number of alternatives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Su et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: