This observational analysis uncovers links between impostor syndrome, anxiety, and professional success in high achievers, suggesting workplace culture plays a significant role.
General Background: Impostor syndrome, also referred to as fraud syndrome, perceived fraudulence, impostor phenomenon, or impostor experience, is a psychological pattern wherein high achievers are unable to internalize their accomplishments. Specific Background: Despite objective indicators of competence and success, individuals experiencing this phenomenon often harbor persistent self-doubt and fear of being exposed as intellectual frauds. Knowledge Gap: Although widely recognized, limited empirical research has systematically explored the cognitive, emotional, and behavioral dimensions of impostor syndrome across diverse professional contexts. Aims: This study aims to investigate the underlying psychological mechanisms of impostor syndrome among high-performing individuals and its impact on mental health, job performance, and professional development.Results: Preliminary findings suggest that impostor syndrome is significantly associated with heightened anxiety, reduced self-efficacy, and increased burnout risk, particularly in competitive and evaluative environments. Novelty: The study offers a multidimensional framework integrating self-perception, external validation, and organizational culture to explain the persistence of impostor experiences among competent professionals. Implications: These insights underscore the need for targeted interventions and workplace policies that address impostor feelings, promote psychological well-being, and foster more inclusive and affirming environments for high-achieving individuals. Highlights: High achievers often struggle with internalizing success. Impostor syndrome is linked to anxiety and burnout. Organizational culture influences impostor experiences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Doaa Mohammed Bachi (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: