Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis compares fencing-specific rehabilitation outcomes to general orthopedic protocols and FIFA 11+, indicating a need for tailored approaches.
Knee injuries are highly prevalent in fencing, as the sports rapid directional changes, explosive lunges, and asymmetric lower-limb loading frequently cause issues like anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears and patellar tendon strain, which threaten athletes performance and long-term career sustainability. Addressing these injuries with effective rehabilitation is crucial for safeguarding fencers athletic careers. This paper focuses on a fencing-specific rehabilitation framework for knee injuries and compares its outcomes against general orthopedic protocols and the FIFA 11+ protocol. The fencing-specific framework is divided into four progressive phases: acute protection, strength restoration, dynamic stability, and return-to-sport reconditioning. Integration of sport-specific biomechanics, psychological readiness assessment, and data-driven monitoring into this framework yielded superior rehabilitation outcomes. Compared to general and FIFA 11+ protocols, the fencing-tailored approach shortened recovery time, enhanced neuromuscular control, and better restored athletes competitive readiness. These findings emphasize the necessity of designing rehabilitation protocols based on fencings unique demands, providing a practical model for clinicians, coaches, and sports organizations to improve fencers health and maintain their competitive performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiaying Shi (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: