Cross-sectional analysis reveals oral health discrepancies in pregnant and non-pregnant women, suggesting targeted hygiene education.
Aim: This study compares the oral health status and hygiene practices of 30 pregnant and 30 non-pregnant women in Sofia, Bulgaria, using the DMFT, FMPS, and PBI. Oral hygiene habits, including brushing frequency, toothbrush type, duration, and technique, were also assessed. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study (January–June 2025) included 30 pregnant women (second/third trimester, aged 18–40 years) and 30 non-pregnant women (aged 18–40 years) from a private dental clinic. Exclusion criteria included systemic diseases and high-risk pregnancies. DMFT, FMPS, and PBI were evaluated by a dentist using standardized tools. Oral hygiene habits were collected via a validated questionnaire. Results: Pregnant women had lower mean DMFT, but higher FMPS and PBI, compared to non-pregnant women. Brushing frequency was similar (90% twice daily). Pregnant women used manual toothbrushes more, brushed for shorter durations and used less circular brushing. Conclusion: Pregnant women exhibit better caries experience (lower DMFT) but poorer oral hygiene (higher FMPS) and higher gingival inflammation than non-pregnant women, despite similar brushing frequency. Targeted oral health education promoting electric toothbrushes and circular brushing techniques is needed to improve maternal oral health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ralitsa Bogovska-Gigova (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: