PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 15, 2025Journal of Health Population and Nutrition2 citationsOpen Access

Association between the inflammatory burden index and erectile dysfunction: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES 2001–2004

View Full Paper
JWJiaXing WangYGYing GaoXCXingJin Chen

Key Points

  • The study shows a significant association between the inflammatory burden index and erectile dysfunction.
  • Among 2,117 male participants, 644 (30.42%) were diagnosed with erectile dysfunction, indicating a notable prevalence.
  • Analysis used logistic regression to validate the association, revealing a strong predictive performance for IBI compared to other markers.
  • Findings highlight IBI's potential role for identifying individuals at increased risk of erectile dysfunction.

Abstract

The inflammatory burden index (IBI) has been recently proposed as a comprehensive marker of systemic inflammation. This study investigated the association between IBI and erectile dysfunction (ED). We analyzed data from 2,117 male participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2001–2004. Participants were categorized into ED and non-ED groups. Multivariate logistic regression assessed the association between IBI and ED occurrence. Smooth curve fitting examined potential non-linear relationships between IBI and ED. Among 2,117 male participants, 644 (30.42%) were diagnosed with ED. After full adjustment, IBI demonstrated a significant positive association with ED (OR = 2.26, 95% CI: 1.54–3.31, p = < 0.0001). Participants in the highest IBI quartile (Q4) had a substantially elevated ED risk compared to the lowest quartile (Q1) (OR = 2.89, 95% CI: 1.61–5.21, p = 0.0004). Smooth curve fitting confirmed a positive correlation between IBI and ED. Subgroup analyses demonstrated consistent associations across different strata. IBI showed superior predictive performance for ED (AUC = 0.6475, 95% CI: 0.6223–0.6727) compared to other inflammatory markers including CRP (AUC = 0.6279), SIRI (AUC = 0.6121), NLR (AUC = 0.6027), and SII (AUC = 0.5580). Our NHANES database analysis demonstrated a significant positive association between IBI and ED. IBI exhibited superior predictive capability for ED compared to established inflammatory markers. These findings suggest IBI's potential utility in clinical settings for identifying individuals at elevated ED risk. However, clinical implementation should be considered exploratory pending validation in diverse prospective populations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f02c7d616531447b5f92c2https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043-025-01093-w
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper