Why the study?
Systemic inflammation contributes to heart failure progression, prompting investigation into the association between the inflammatory burden index and heart failure risk.
Is a higher inflammatory burden index associated with an increased risk of heart failure?
Is a higher inflammatory burden index associated with an increased risk of heart failure?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Higher inflammatory burden index is independently associated with an increased risk of heart failure, suggesting its potential utility as a risk stratification tool.
BACKGROUND: Systemic inflammation contributes to the progression of heart failure (HF). This study aims to investigate the association between inflammatory burden index (IBI) and HF risk. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study of NHANES 2003-2017, data from 19,856 participants were analyzed, including 652 participants with HF and 19,204 without HF. Participants were categorized into quartiles based on IBI levels (Q1-Q4). The risk of HF across these quartiles was assessed with adjustment for potential confounders and restricted cubic spline analyses were used to evaluate dose-response relationships. RESULTS: Our results show that participants with HF have higher IBI levels compared to those without HF (2.66 ± 0.27 vs. 1.05 ± 0.03, p < 0.001). The prevalence of HF increases with higher IBI quartiles: Quartile 1 (1.2%), Quartile 2 (1.33%), Quartile 3 (2.60%), and Quartile 4 (4.37%) (p < 0.001). After adjusting for potential confounders, the risk of HF remained elevated across the quartiles: Quartile 2 (odds ratio [OR] = 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48-1.10), Quartile 3 (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.70-1.61), and Quartile 4 (OR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.02-2.10) compared to Quartile 1. Restricted cubic spline analysis further confirmed a substantial positive-linear correlation between IBI and HF risk. CONCLUSION: Higher levels of IBI are related to a high risk of HF, independent of traditional risk factors. These results suggest that IBI could be a useful parameter for identifying individuals at higher risk of HF. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: