Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Linguo-semiotic characteristics influence the translation of terms in interpersonal intelligence, revealing their underlying semantic connections.
Context and relevance. The relevance of the research problem is determined by the necessity of analyzing the author’s term as the sign, realizing language potential in standard semiotic tools, as well as in neology and unique conceptualization in the metalanguage of science. The issue of author’s semiosis is examined in the framework of modern semiotics of language and translation, revealing its significance in popularization of scientific knowledge and overcoming complexities in translation to ensure correct reception of the author’s sign in inter-cultural community. Objective. It is necessary to determine linguo-semiotic characteristics of the author's sign, which determine its interpretation and designing efficient strategies and technique of translation. Hypothesis. Elements of the terms in the analyzed microsystem display complex semantic-syntactic correlations, revealing basic conceptual properties of the analyzed notions of the sign. Methods and materials. The core of the research is lingo-semiotic approach, with application of semantic analysis of the terminological signs, analysis of author’s definitions and descriptions, semantic-syntactic analysis of multi-component attributive terminological structures, comparative analysis of correlated terminological units in the source language and target language. Results. Classifying and partitive relations of terminological signs in the analyzed microsystem reveal oppositive links of contrastive pair in the cluster intrapersonal и interpersonal intelligences. Semantic analysis specifies differential features in their complex correlation with the basic concept of multiple intelligences, i.e. concepts of activities, reflections, interaction, perception, empathy. Conclusions. Interpretation and translation of author’s terminological signs is performed with regard to their linguo-semiotic characteristics with application of structural-semantic and functional analysis of the sign, analysis of its deep syntactic multi-component structure, providing for disclosing essentials of the represented concepts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
K.G. Manukyan (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: