Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis finds that conspiracy theories serve as storytelling in communities, highlighting social practices and psychological diversity.
We offer a novel analysis of conspiracy theorizing, according to which conspiracy theory communities are engaged in collective projects of storytelling. Other recent accounts start by analyzing individual conspiracy theorists’ psychologies. We argue that a more explanatorily unifying account emerges when we start by analyzing conspiracy theorizing as a social practice. This helps us better account for conspiracy theorists’ psychological heterogeneity. Some individual theorists care about uncovering the truth, while others incorporate truth into their theorizing in subtler ways; viewed as a social phenomenon, though, the function of conspiracy theorizing is not to discover the truth, but to tell good stories.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Munro et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: