This evaluation shows that glucose enhances recovery and reduces apoptosis in hCAR-T cells, suggesting viable alternatives to commercial cryoprotectants.
Human chimeric antigen receptor T (hCAR-T) cells are highly potent cellular therapeutics, but their clinical utility depends on stable long-term preservation due to high production costs and lengthy manufacturing processes. Cryopreservation is essential for ensuring the quality and logistics of these therapies. However, current commercial cryoprotectants such as CellBanker® are limited by high cost, undisclosed composition, and lack of flexibility for optimization. This study aimed to evaluate defined sugar-based cryoprotectants-trehalose, sucrose, and glucose-as potential alternatives for hCAR-T cell preservation. hCAR-T cells were cryopreserved using various concentrations of the three sugars in combination with DMSO. Post-thaw evaluations included viability, recovery, apoptosis, proliferative capacity, and immunophenotypic analysis. At 18 h after thawing, glucose 50 mM significantly improved recovery (1.03 ± 0.29 vs. 1.59 ± 0.20×10⁶ cells) and reduced apoptosis (52.58 ± 7.31% vs. 39.50 ± 2.16%) compared with DMSO alone. These results were comparable to, and in some cases exceeded, those obtained with the commercial product CellBanker®. Moreover, glucose at 50 mM exhibited approximately 1.9-fold higher cell proliferation after three days of culture compared to CellBanker®, while preserving a stable CD4+/CD8+ ratio and central memory T cell (TCM) profile. These findings indicate that sugar-based cryoprotectants, particularly glucose at 50 mM, can support post-thaw survival and function of hCAR-T cells. Given their defined composition, lower cost, and comparable efficacy, sugar-based formulations represent promising alternatives to commercial cryopreservation agents for advanced cell therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jung et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: