Review synthesizes insights into biochemical mechanisms and management strategies for citrus affected by nematodes, suggesting integrated approaches.
The slow decline of citrus is a complex syndrome primarily driven by the citrus nematode (Tylenchulus semipenetrans); with unexplained modulating influences from abiotic stressors such as soil salinity and nutrient imbalances. This review synthesises existing knowledge on the physiological and biochemical mechanisms underlying this progressive economic decline; focusing on the interplay between nematode infection; abrupt reduction in root-to-shoot ratio; and consequent osmolyte dynamics; along with management implications. The pruning effects of nematode females at death; result in abrupt diversion of the root-to-shoot ratio from the normal seasonal cycle; which triggers a series of dehydration- and ion-toxicity-avoidance mechanisms; where citrus trees redistribute hyperosmotic osmolytes; which involve chemical and physiological adjustments to restore the stable seasonal root-to-shoot ratio. This review underscores the importance of maintaining a stable seasonal root-to-shoot ratio through integrated management strategies. Avoiding mechanical weeding; while maintaining light shoot pruning; strategic fertilisation with potassium supplementation; improved irrigation management and selection of dual salt-tolerant and nematode-resistant-rootstocks are crucial for sustaining orchard longevity and productivity. By integrating the proposed strategies; citrus growers can improve tree longevity; maintain fruit production; and ensure long-term orchard sustainability. In conclusion; the review highlights the necessity of a holistic; multipronged management approach to mitigate the slow decline of citrus; with future research focusing on molecular pathways that govern the root-to-shoot homeostasis by exploring breeding strategies for citrus rootstocks with enhanced resilience against both biotic and abiotic stressors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mashela et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: