This analysis shows how Yang-Mills theory emerges from relational ontology in a non-Abelian framework, suggesting new conceptual foundations for gauge theories.
This paper demonstrates that Yang-Mills theory, the mathematical foundation of the Standard Model, can be derived from the first principles of a relational ontology as described by Covariant Rotation Geometry (CRG). We begin by elevating CRG from its original Abelian formulation to a general non-Abelian framework capable of describing finite rotations. By introducing dynamics, we show that the requirement of relational consistency naturally gives rise to a non-Abelian gauge field, whose curvature measures the failure of relational transitivity. We then establish that the only gauge-invariant and Lorentz-invariant action describing the dynamics of this relational structure is the Yang-Mills action. This result suggests that Yang-Mills theory is not an ad-hoc mathematical construct but the inevitable consequence of a physical reality built upon relational principles. Our work provides a new conceptual foundation for gauge theories, unifying the geometric intuition of Einstein with the symmetry principles of Yang.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang Zicong (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: