Comparative analysis reveals that mucosal immunization enhances antibody responses in the respiratory tract, supporting robust viral immunity.
Systemically administered influenza vaccines provide strain-limited protection, while influenza infection of the respiratory epithelium supports development of lung resident memory B and T cells and more broadly reactive antibody responses. To test whether local antigen delivery is critical for establishing broad immunity, we directly compared respiratory tract and systemic delivery of influenza antigens to mice and hamsters using a replication-deficient adenovirus serotype 5 vector (Ad5 [E1-,E2b-,E3-]). Both immunization routes elicited antibody responses in the lower respiratory tract and antigen-specific B and T cells in the draining lymph node. However, only intranasal immunization established lung-resident memory B and T cells, induced IgA responses in the upper respiratory tract directly at the site of viral entry and supported generation of IgA and IgG antibodies that bound antigenically drifted and distantly related influenza strains, including those of avian origin. Intranasal immunization accelerated viral clearance following heterologous virus challenge and was associated with limited pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis. Thus, intranasal immunization with the immunologically stealthy Ad5 [E1-,E2b-,E3-] platform supports respiratory and systemic immunity to divergent influenza strains in the absence of overt lung immunopathology, suggesting that local antigen delivery may be key to development of more broadly protective universal flu vaccines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schultz et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: