Analysis reveals novel chiral structures for nucleon decays, suggesting new avenues for exploring baryon number violation.
We examine the most general nucleon decay interactions that involve three light quarks without being acted upon by a derivative. We identify four generic operator structures that correspond to the irreducible representations in the chiral group <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mrow><a:msub><a:mrow><a:mi>SU</a:mi><a:mo stretchy="false">(</a:mo><a:mn>3</a:mn><a:mo stretchy="false">)</a:mo></a:mrow><a:mrow><a:mi mathvariant="monospace">L</a:mi></a:mrow></a:msub><a:mo stretchy="false">⊗</a:mo><a:msub><a:mrow><a:mi>SU</a:mi><a:mo stretchy="false">(</a:mo><a:mn>3</a:mn><a:mo stretchy="false">)</a:mo></a:mrow><a:mrow><a:mi mathvariant="monospace">R</a:mi></a:mrow></a:msub></a:mrow></a:math> of QCD, <j:math xmlns:j="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><j:mrow><j:mo stretchy="false">{</j:mo><j:msub><j:mrow><j:mn mathvariant="bold">8</j:mn></j:mrow><j:mrow><j:mi mathvariant="monospace">L</j:mi></j:mrow></j:msub><j:mo stretchy="false">⊗</j:mo><j:msub><j:mrow><j:mn mathvariant="bold">1</j:mn></j:mrow><j:mrow><j:mi mathvariant="monospace">R</j:mi></j:mrow></j:msub><j:mo>,</j:mo><j:msub><j:mrow><j:mover accent="true"><j:mrow><j:mn mathvariant="bold">3</j:mn></j:mrow><j:mrow><j:mo stretchy="false">¯</j:mo></j:mrow></j:mover></j:mrow><j:mrow><j:mi mathvariant="monospace">L</j:mi></j:mrow></j:msub><j:mo stretchy="false">⊗</j:mo><j:msub><j:mrow><j:mn mathvariant="bold">3</j:mn></j:mrow><j:mrow><j:mi mathvariant="monospace">R</j:mi></j:mrow></j:msub><j:mo>,</j:mo><j:msub><j:mrow><j:mn mathvariant="bold">6</j:mn></j:mrow><j:mrow><j:mi mathvariant="monospace">L</j:mi></j:mrow></j:msub><j:mo stretchy="false">⊗</j:mo><j:msub><j:mrow><j:mn mathvariant="bold">3</j:mn></j:mrow><j:mrow><j:mi mathvariant="monospace">R</j:mi></j:mrow></j:msub><j:mo>,</j:mo><j:msub><j:mrow><j:mn mathvariant="bold">10</j:mn></j:mrow><j:mrow><j:mi mathvariant="monospace">L</j:mi></j:mrow></j:msub><j:mo stretchy="false">⊗</j:mo><j:msub><j:mrow><j:mn mathvariant="bold">1</j:mn></j:mrow><j:mrow><j:mi mathvariant="monospace">R</j:mi></j:mrow></j:msub><j:mo stretchy="false">}</j:mo></j:mrow></j:math>, plus their chirality partners under the interchange of chiralities <jb:math xmlns:jb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><jb:mrow><jb:mi mathvariant="monospace">L</jb:mi></jb:mrow><jb:mo stretchy="false">↔</jb:mo><jb:mrow><jb:mi mathvariant="monospace">R</jb:mi></jb:mrow></jb:math>. While half of them have been extensively discussed in the literature, the other half, <ob:math xmlns:ob="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><ob:mrow><ob:msub><ob:mrow><ob:mn mathvariant="bold">6</ob:mn></ob:mrow><ob:mrow><ob:mi mathvariant="monospace">L</ob:mi><ob:mo stretchy="false">(</ob:mo><ob:mi mathvariant="monospace">R</ob:mi><ob:mo stretchy="false">)</ob:mo></ob:mrow></ob:msub><ob:mo stretchy="false">⊗</ob:mo><ob:msub><ob:mrow><ob:mn mathvariant="bold">3</ob:mn></ob:mrow><ob:mrow><ob:mi mathvariant="monospace">R</ob:mi><ob:mo stretchy="false">(</ob:mo><ob:mi mathvariant="monospace">L</ob:mi><ob:mo stretchy="false">)</ob:mo></ob:mrow></ob:msub></ob:mrow></ob:math> and <bc:math xmlns:bc="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><bc:mrow><bc:msub><bc:mrow><bc:mover accent="true"><bc:mrow><bc:mn mathvariant="bold">10</bc:mn></bc:mrow><bc:mrow><bc:mo stretchy="true">¯</bc:mo></bc:mrow></bc:mover></bc:mrow><bc:mrow><bc:mi mathvariant="monospace">L</bc:mi><bc:mo stretchy="false">(</bc:mo><bc:mi mathvariant="monospace">R</bc:mi><bc:mo stretchy="false">)</bc:mo></bc:mrow></bc:msub><bc:mo stretchy="false">⊗</bc:mo><bc:msub><bc:mrow><bc:mn mathvariant="bold">1</bc:mn></bc:mrow><bc:mrow><bc:mi mathvariant="monospace">R</bc:mi><bc:mo stretchy="false">(</bc:mo><bc:mi mathvariant="monospace">L</bc:mi><bc:mo stretchy="false">)</bc:mo></bc:mrow></bc:msub></bc:mrow></bc:math>, are identified for the first time. We perform chiral matching for these interactions at the leading chiral order and find that each has a unique chiral realization in terms of the octet baryons and pseudoscalars. Notably, the chiral interaction in the <qc:math xmlns:qc="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><qc:mrow><qc:msub><qc:mrow><qc:mn mathvariant="bold">6</qc:mn></qc:mrow><qc:mrow><qc:mi mathvariant="monospace">L</qc:mi><qc:mo stretchy="false">(</qc:mo><qc:mi mathvariant="monospace">R</qc:mi><qc:mo stretchy="false">)</qc:mo></qc:mrow></qc:msub><qc:mo stretchy="false">⊗</qc:mo><qc:msub><qc:mrow><qc:mn mathvariant="bold">3</qc:mn></qc:mrow><qc:mrow><qc:mi mathvariant="monospace">R</qc:mi><qc:mo stretchy="false">(</qc:mo><qc:mi mathvariant="monospace">L</qc:mi><qc:mo stretchy="false">)</qc:mo></qc:mrow></qc:msub></qc:mrow></qc:math> representation appears at the same chiral order as those of the known ones, while the one in the <dd:math xmlns:dd="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><dd:msub><dd:mn mathvariant="bold">10</dd:mn><dd:mrow><dd:mi mathvariant="monospace">L</dd:mi><dd:mo stretchy="false">(</dd:mo><dd:mi mathvariant="monospace">R</dd:mi><dd:mo stretchy="false">)</dd:mo></dd:mrow></dd:msub><dd:mo stretchy="false">⊗</dd:mo><dd:msub><dd:mn mathvariant="bold">1</dd:mn><dd:mrow><dd:mi mathvariant="monospace">R</dd:mi><dd:mo stretchy="false">(</dd:mo><dd:mi mathvariant="monospace">L</dd:mi><dd:mo stretchy="false">)</dd:mo></dd:mrow></dd:msub></dd:math> representation appears at a higher chiral order. These new structures are prevalent in effective field theories and ultraviolet models, and they offer novel experimental avenues to search for baryon number violating nucleon decays.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: