This analysis reveals key machine learning models predict water quality in Bouhamdane Basin, suggesting advanced methods enhance agricultural management.
This study evaluates the performance of machine learning algorithms in predicting the Irrigation Water Quality Index (IWQI) for irrigation in the Bouhamdane Basin, with XGBoost ML-2 emerging as the most accurate model (R2 = 0.93, RMSE = 0.047). Other boosting-based methods like ADABoost ML-4 (R2 = 0.79, RMSE = 0.085) and CatBoost ML-2 (R2 = 0.87, RMSE = 0.065), as well as Random Forest ML-2 (R2 = 0.89, RMSE = 0.06), also demonstrate strong predictive capabilities, outperforming Linear and Support Vector Regression models. Additionally, voting ensemble models (R2 = 0.90, RMSE = 0.06) highlight the effectiveness of integrating multiple algorithms. The study also analyzes key water quality parameters, revealing variability in irrigation suitability, with some samples posing salinity and sodicity risks (SAR up to 24.509, IWQI as low as 16.86) and others being suitable (IWQI up to 53.80). Overall, the study underscores the significant role of advanced machine learning techniques in improving water quality assessment for irrigation, offering valuable insights for environmental monitoring and agricultural water management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guettaf et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: