This paper demonstrates how light axions can be realized, suggesting new mechanisms for symmetry breaking and reheating.
We consider axions lighter than what their QCD couplings might otherwise suggest. Starting with a <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:msub><a:mi mathvariant="double-struck">Z</a:mi><a:mi>N</a:mi></a:msub></a:math> axion, we introduce a small explicit <d:math xmlns:d="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><d:msub><d:mi mathvariant="double-struck">Z</d:mi><d:mi>N</d:mi></d:msub></d:math> symmetry-breaking coupling between the Standard Model Higgs boson and a reheaton. This small explicit breaking allows us to populate a large portion of the light axion <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><g:msub><g:mi>m</g:mi><g:mi>a</g:mi></g:msub><g:mo>−</g:mo><g:msub><g:mi>f</g:mi><g:mi>a</g:mi></g:msub></g:math> plane, removes the <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><i:mn>1</i:mn><i:mo>/</i:mo><i:mi>N</i:mi></i:math> tuning in the <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><k:msub><k:mi mathvariant="double-struck">Z</k:mi><k:mi>N</k:mi></k:msub></k:math>-axion, and explains why only our sector was reheated. Because of finite temperature effects, axions of this sort undergo either “rigged” misalignment, where the axion misalignment angle is effectively <n:math xmlns:n="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><n:mi>π</n:mi></n:math> regardless of its initial value, or “shuffled” misalignment, where the initial angle is effectively randomized.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Banerjee et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: