Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Conditional triple difference-in-differences reveals causal effects in empirical studies, highlighting bias due to covariate distributions.
Triple difference-in-differences designs are widely used to estimate causal effects in empirical work. Surveying the literature, we find that most applications include controls. We show that this standard practice is generally biased for the target causal estimand when covariate distributions differ across groups. To address this, we propose identifying a causal estimand by fixing the covariate distribution to that of one group. We then develop a double-robust estimator and illustrate its application in a canonical policy setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dor Leventer (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: