Abstract We analyze the diurnal variability of atmospheric , , and CO 2 above the canopies of two contrasting ecosystems: the Amazon tropical forest and the Loobos temperate forest. Using a coupled forest‐atmosphere model constrained by tower‐based and aircraft observations, we quantify the role of atmospheric processes—including entrainment, subsidence, and cloud ventilation—in shaping the diurnal amplitude, or diurnal range (DR), of carbon‐cycle tracers. Our results show that atmospheric processes can contribute more than twice as much as surface processes to DR. Misrepresenting these influences leads to substantial errors in interpreting observations and modeling tracer variability. We propose using DR as a metric to evaluate atmospheric tracer transport models and to compare site‐level measurements. We present a roadmap to identify which atmospheric or surface processes are poorly represented when modeled and observed DR diverge.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kim A. P. Faassen
Scripps Institution of Oceanography
Raquel González‐Armas
Wageningen University & Research
Gerbrand Koren
Utrecht University
Geophysical Research Letters
University of Copenhagen
Utrecht University
University of Groningen
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Faassen et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68f0f51d8dd8ea469b1d6ec0 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2025gl118016