Objective evaluations reveal significant shifts in fatigue levels in nurses after shifts, suggesting facial metrics may indicate fatigue status.
Background/Objectives: This study aimed to objectively assess fatigue levels using facial expressions. Methods: This study included 25 female nurses aged between 30 and 50 years. We compared their subjective and objective fatigue levels after a night shift, when accumulated fatigue was assumed, with those after a day off, when recovery was expected. Fatigue levels were subjectively assessed using questionnaires and were also quantified by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Objective evaluations included (1) the degree of eye-opening, (2) the maximum distance and speed of facial skin movement by tracking changes in coordinate values of facial markers on the skin during intentional smiling, and (3) analysis of high-frequency (HF) components and the low frequency-to-high frequency (LF/HF) ratio in heart rate variability (HRV). Results: After a night shift, compared to after a day off, subjective assessments of mental and physical fatigue in the questionnaires and VAS values of own fatigue were significantly elevated. Concurrently, objective evaluations revealed that the degree of eye-opening, along with the maximum movement distance and speed of the lower eyelid, cheek, and mouth corners during intentional smiling, were significantly reduced. Furthermore, the HF component, an index of parasympathetic activity, significantly decreased, whereas the LF/HF ratio, an index of sympathetic activity, significantly increased. Additionally, significant correlations were observed between subjective VAS estimation of fatigue levels and each objective parameter examined. Conclusions: Measuring facial parameters is an effective method for objectively assessing facial expressions of fatigue, and these changes are mediated through reduced parasympathetic nervous activity and increased sympathetic nervous activity during fatigue.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nagashima et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: