Qualitative study explores simulation's impact on medical education in Rwanda, highlighting key barriers and benefits.
Simulation is a valuable technique in training health professionals, but the availability of resources determines which equipment, trainers, and methods to use in each simulation program. Low-income countries face barriers such as a shortage of trained staff and equipment, inadequate infrastructure, and other context-specific challenges in using simulation for training healthcare professionals. This qualitative study, employing semi-structured interviews, aimed to explore medical students' experiences with learning by simulation in Rwanda, a low-income country. This is among the first studies to explore simulation-based education from student perspectives in Rwanda. Fifteen (n = 15) medical students (male: n = 12; female: n = 3) provided consent to participate in semi-structured interviews. Despite the many challenges faced by medical students as they engaged in simulation-based learning, study participants demonstrated an interest in learning through simulation. They perceived it as essential in acquiring and enhancing procedural skills in a relaxed and no-stakes learning environment. Additionally, learning by simulation methods helps medical students approach patients confidently, especially those with complex and/or less common medical conditions. Study participants identified organizational issues and limited simulation capacity as significant barriers to the effective implementation of simulation-based medical education in Rwanda. They expressed the need to invest more time and resources in simulation for a more impactful simulation-based training program. Integrating standardized simulation into a formal medical curriculum would address most of the organizational issues encountered and lead to a structured and consistent skills training program throughout undergraduate medical training in Rwanda.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Niyongombwa et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: