This framework enhances occlusion-robust detection in UAVs while ensuring data privacy, demonstrating effective performance even under non-IID data conditions.
Swarm-based UAV cooperative ground target detection faces critical challenges including sensitivity to small targets, susceptibility to occlusion, and data heterogeneity across distributed platforms. To address these issues, we propose FedGTD-UAVs—a privacy-preserving federated transfer learning (FTL) framework optimized for real-time swarm perception tasks. Our solution integrates three key innovations: (1) an FTL paradigm employing centralized pre-training on public datasets followed by federated fine-tuning of sparse parameter subsets—under severe non-Independent and Identically Distributed (non-IID) data distributions, this paradigm ensures data privacy while maintaining over 98% performance; (2) an Space-to-Depth Convolution (SPD-Conv) backbone that replaces lossy downsampling with lossless space-to-depth operations, preserving fine-grained spatial features critical for small targets; (3) a lightweight Global Context Network (GCNet) module leverages contextual reasoning to effectively capture long-range dependencies, thereby enhancing robustness against occluded objects while maintaining real-time inference at 217 FPS. Extensive validation on VisDrone2019 and CARPK benchmarks demonstrates state-of-the-art performance: 44.2% mAP@0.5 (surpassing YOLOv8s by 12.1%) with 3.2× superior accuracy-efficiency trade-off. Compared to traditional centralized learning methods that rely on global data sharing and pose privacy risks, as well as the significant performance degradation of standard federated learning under non-IID data, this framework successfully resolves the core conflict between data privacy protection and detection performance maintenance, providing a secure and efficient solution for real-world deployment in complex dynamic environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: